Top Companies in 2025
Hide.me vs Hotspot Shield
Presione [Agregar para comparar] para Modificar, Agregar o Eliminar proveedores.
Hide.me VPN, established in 2012 and headquartered in Malaysia, has built a reputation as a reliable and privacy-focused VPN provider. Designed to meet the needs of both casual and advanced users, Hide.me VPN offers robust security features, including AES-256 encryption, a strict no-logs policy, and support for advanced protocols like WireGuard and OpenVPN. With over 2,600 servers across 91 locations, they provide global coverage, allowing users to bypass geo-restrictions, maintain online anonymity, and secure their internet connection. The company’s unique features, such as split tunneling, a kill switch, and obfuscated servers, cater to diverse user needs, including streaming, torrenting, and navigating restrictive internet environments. Customers appreciate the user-friendly interface and the availability of a free plan, though some have noted occasional connection issues. With positive feedback on platforms like Trustpilot and Capterra, Hide.me VPN has established itself as a competitive player in the VPN industry. Whether you’re seeking enhanced privacy or unrestricted access, Hide.me VPN offers a range of tools to explore further.
Hotspot Shield, developed by Pango (formerly AnchorFree Inc.), is a prominent VPN service headquartered in Redwood City, California, with additional offices in Boston and Ukraine. Founded in 2005 by David Gorodyansky and Eugene Malobrodsky, the company has grown significantly, boasting over 3,200 servers across over 80 countries. This extensive server network allows users to bypass geo-restrictions and access region-locked content, enhancing privacy and security online. Hotspot Shield offers both free and premium plans. The free version includes limited server access and a daily data cap, while the premium version provides faster speeds, a broader server selection, and additional features like antivirus protection. A standout feature of Hotspot Shield is their proprietary Catapult Hydra protocol, which aims to deliver enhanced speed and security compared to traditional VPN protocols. Despite their strengths, Hotspot Shield has faced criticism for not conducting third-party audits to verify their no-logging policy. However, they maintain a strict no-logging policy to protect user privacy. The service is available on multiple platforms, including iOS, macOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. As of December 31, 2024, Hotspot Shield will discontinue support for router-based VPN configurations.
- A partir de (por mes) : $4.99
- Prueba gratuita : Disponible
- Seguridad y privacidad : Excelente
- Evitando la geocensura : Good
- Mas de 3,000 servidores : 2,600
- A partir de (por mes) : $6.99
- Prueba gratuita : Disponible
- Seguridad y privacidad : Buena
- Evitando la geocensura : Fair
- Mas de 3,000 servidores : 3200
- Aplicación de Mobile
- Controles administrativos
- Llenador de formularios
- Mas de 50 diferente ubicaciónes del servidor
- OSS integrados
- Permite el uso de torrents
- Plan gratuito—Undisclosed
- Soporte para Onion over VPN
- Soporte para OpenVPN
- Suporte de WireGuard
- Version gratuita
- Aplicación de Mobile
- Controles administrativos
- Llenador de formularios—Undisclosed
- Mas de 50 diferente ubicaciónes del servidor
- OSS integrados—Undisclosed
- Permite el uso de torrents
- Plan gratuito—Undisclosed
- Soporte para Onion over VPN
- Soporte para OpenVPN
- Suporte de WireGuard
- Version gratuita
- Autenticación de dos factores
- Desconexión automática
- Encriptación de 256-bit AES
- Funcionalidad split tunneling
- Los servidores operan en RAM (no se escriben datos en los discos duros)
- Política de cero registros
- Servidores IP dedicados
- Warrant Canary—Undisclosed
- Autenticación de dos factores—Undisclosed
- Desconexión automática
- Encriptación de 256-bit AES
- Funcionalidad split tunneling
- Los servidores operan en RAM (no se escriben datos en los discos duros)—Undisclosed
- Política de cero registros
- Servidores IP dedicados
- Warrant Canary
- Accesos biométricos (Face ID, Touch ID)
- Bóveda con encriptación de 256 bits
- Compartir contraseñas de forma segura—Undisclosed
- Desbloqueo por PIN de la aplicación móvil
- Escaneo de la web oscura
- Situado fuera de el 5/9/14 de 'Eyes Alliance'
- Un informe sobre la seguridad de las contraseñas
- Accesos biométricos (Face ID, Touch ID)—Undisclosed
- Bóveda con encriptación de 256 bits—Undisclosed
- Compartir contraseñas de forma segura—Undisclosed
- Desbloqueo por PIN de la aplicación móvil—Undisclosed
- Escaneo de la web oscura
- Situado fuera de el 5/9/14 de 'Eyes Alliance'
- Un informe sobre la seguridad de las contraseñas
- Android
- Fire OS—Undisclosed
- Google Chrome
- iOS
- Linux
- macOS
- Servicios de streaming compatibles—Undisclosed
- Streaming Devices
- Suporte del router
- Windows
- Android
- Fire OS
- Google Chrome—Undisclosed
- iOS
- Linux
- macOS
- Servicios de streaming compatibles—Undisclosed
- Streaming Devices—Undisclosed
- Suporte del router
- Windows
- Artículos de ayuda y guías de búsqueda
- Asistencia telefónica
- Chat en directo
- Extensión del navegador
- Soporte de correo electrónico
- Soporte de Tickets
- Velocidad—Undisclosed
- Artículos de ayuda y guías de búsqueda
- Asistencia telefónica—Undisclosed
- Chat en directo
- Extensión del navegador
- Soporte de correo electrónico
- Soporte de Tickets—Undisclosed
- Velocidad—Undisclosed
Hide.me vs. Hotspot Shield
Hotspot Shield and Hide.me are two prominent VPN providers. This comparison explores their service offerings, customization options, ease of use, security features, and pricing to provide a well-rounded evaluation.
Service range and customization options
Both Hotspot Shield and Hide.me offer extensive global server networks, enabling users to bypass geo-restrictions and access content from various regions. They support multiple VPN protocols, including OpenVPN and IKEv2, catering to diverse user preferences for speed and security. Additionally, both services provide customizable settings, allowing users to tailor their VPN experience to their specific needs.
However, distinctions arise in their offerings. Hotspot Shield boasts a proprietary Hydra protocol, designed to enhance connection speeds and performance, particularly beneficial for streaming and downloading content. In contrast, Hide.me offers a free version of its service, albeit with limited features, providing an accessible option for users seeking basic VPN functionalities. Moreover, Hide.me supports a broader range of protocols, including WireGuard, known for its high performance and security.
Ease of use and integration
User-friendliness is a hallmark of both VPNs. They offer intuitive applications across various platforms, including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, ensuring seamless integration into users’ digital ecosystems. The installation processes are straightforward, and the interfaces are designed for easy navigation, accommodating both novice and experienced users.
Differences emerge in device compatibility and simultaneous connections. Hotspot Shield allows up to five simultaneous device connections, which may suffice for individual users but could be limiting for larger households. On the other hand, Hide.me permits up to ten simultaneous connections, offering greater flexibility for users with multiple devices. Additionally, Hide.me provides browser extensions, enhancing its integration capabilities for users who prefer lightweight solutions.
Security and compliance
Both providers implement robust measures to protect user data. They employ AES-256 encryption, a standard considered unbreakable by current technology, ensuring that user information remains confidential. Features like automatic kill switches are present in both services, preventing data leaks by disconnecting the internet if the VPN connection drops unexpectedly.
A notable difference lies in their jurisdictional bases. Hide.me is headquartered in Malaysia, a country outside the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances, which are international agreements facilitating data sharing between governments. This location offers a privacy advantage, as Malaysia does not mandate data retention, aligning with Hide.me’s strict no-logs policy. Conversely, Hotspot Shield operates under U.S. jurisdiction, a member of the Five Eyes alliance, which may raise concerns for privacy-conscious users. Nonetheless, Hotspot Shield asserts a no-logs policy, stating that it does not store user activity data.
Pricing
Affordability and value are critical considerations for users selecting a VPN service. Hide.me offers a free tier, providing basic VPN services with limited data and server access, serving as an entry point for users new to VPNs. Its premium plans start at $9.95 per month, with discounts available for longer-term commitments, making it a cost-effective choice for comprehensive features.
Hotspot Shield does not offer a free tier but provides a 7-day free trial for users to evaluate its services. Its premium plans are priced at $7.99 per month, offering a balance between cost and performance. While slightly more affordable on a monthly basis, Hotspot Shield’s limitation on simultaneous connections may influence users with multiple devices to consider their specific needs when choosing between the two.
Conclusion
In summary, both Hotspot Shield and Hide.me present robust VPN solutions with unique strengths. Hotspot Shield excels in delivering high-speed connections through its proprietary Hydra protocol, making it an excellent choice for users prioritizing performance, especially for streaming and downloading. Hide.me distinguishes itself with a generous free tier, a higher allowance for simultaneous connections, and a jurisdiction that favors stringent privacy protections. Ultimately, the optimal choice between the two hinges on individual user priorities, whether they lean towards speed and performance or enhanced privacy and flexibility.